One thing I got from lwrunner's group chat (see private forum) was the habit of reviewing 'how' you played a session. This is not reviewing hands. What I do now is make a list of good and bad things I did in the session. For example, played a crazy and loose opponent today. He called 3bets with 70% of hands, literally never folded to cbets, called 2 barrels to bluff rivers, played tricky with monsters (loved to c/r river), potted every turn when i checked flop, 3-bet 32% and rarely folded to 4-bets, etc.

Good
- Adjusted 2 barrel frequency in 3bet pots (he had a huge timing tell)
- Check strong hands on turn and river often, sometiems bet turn and check river based on texture. Guy would float complete air 2 streets and bluff river..
- Check tons of flops in position to call him down
- Raise with mostly hands that call or 4-bet to his 3-bets

Bad
- In general, it takes your brain a while to really adjust to extreme players. bttech's video vs stevebets is a great example. Still some spots where I should be checking rivers oop, and not raising turns because his range is so incredibly wide.
eg. i 3bet 75s, cbet K93ss, turn 7s I bet (based on timing and board 75 is good here like 90% of the time). River is offsuit 7 for board of K93ss77. I insta shoved for pot, but clearly mistake in heat of battle. His range for calling 2 streets is so much wider than the average player. Most players have made hands here and call a much wider range than betting (of worst hands at least). But this guy can have any gutshot, any lone spade, A -highs with no spade. He is betting way wider than calling. But sometimes it takes our brain a while to realize these things

- Didn't bluff raise enough on flops that he is bluffing very often/rarely hits and doesn't play back on.
- Should play turn slower more often with strong hands since his cbet + turn checks in 3bpots was generally weak.