I think this first hand is really cool because of the way the hand played out. I was put in a spot where I could possibly make the biggest and best fold of my career. I'll walk you through my thought process on each street:

No-Limit Hold'em, $10.00 BB (6 handed)

UTG ($2812)
Hero (MP) ($1045)
CO ($5460)
Button ($1000)
SB ($1143)
BB ($5482)

Preflop: Hero is MP with Q, A
UTG bets $30, Hero calls $30, 1 fold, Button calls $30, 2 folds
This seems fairly standard to me. Both players are regs, UTG can be tricky. I don't wanna 3bet UTG with AQo unless I have specific reads.

Flop: ($105) 2, 5, Q (3 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks, Button bets $70, UTG calls $70, Hero calls $70
This is where it starts to get interesting. I do not bet the flop because I don't mind it getting checked through, plus I think the BTN will stab a decent amount and I can rep midpairs by check/calling. It is key in this hand to notice that I overcall UTG. I put UTG on JJ type of hand, and my overcall should look exactly like Qx. I would fold 99 here (and probably bet the flop with it in the first place).

Turn: ($315) Q (3 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks, Button bets $210, UTG calls $210, Hero calls $210
The turn is another Queen. Now it gets really interesting. My hand looks exactly like Qx after the flop, making it a terrible card for BTN to continue bluffing on. Everyone in the hand basically knows that I very likely have trips, yet the BTN still wants to bet and UTG still wants to call. After UTG calls I can not put him on JJ or even AA, for that matter, anymore. I strongly believe that UTG has KQ at the very least, but mostly AQ. My top trips have become a hand where I am very likely splitting against UTG, and crushed by the BTN. I timed my timebank down hovering over the fold button until the last few seconds. Sadly, I could not make the fold.

River: ($945) A (3 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks, Button checks
Luckily, I can visualize an Ace on the river. No more worries. And it is probably this feeling of relief that caused me to make a terrible play on the river. If it were headsup I should check because he'll be valuebetting all the hands that can call a shove and the 0.5% of the time he's bluffing I've got to let him hang himself. Here however, we are 3handed! A shove is mandatory now just in case the BTN checks behind with whatever still is in his range, whether it be a bluff or KQ, and UTG shows a monster. It's hard to explain this last part, but if you go over the things that can happen when I check or shove, it becomes clear that I should shove. I do not give them credit for being able to fold 55 or 22

Total pot: $945

Results:
Button didn't show
UTG had 5, 5 (full house, fives over Queens).
Hero had Q, A (full house, Queens over Aces).
Outcome: Hero won $942

No-Limit Hold'em, $20.00 BB (5 handed)

UTG ($2398)
Hero (MP) ($2666)
Button ($2158)
SB ($2010)
BB ($1046.20)

Preflop: Hero is MP with 7, 6
1 fold, Hero bets $50, Button raises $180, 2 folds, Hero calls $130
Villain is ken the cow. I don't recall playing with him. Preflop probably is too loose OOP, but he had 3bet a fair amount and I was planning to check/raise a good portion of the flops. Still a fold probably, but I'm only human.

Flop: ($390) Q, 4, J (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks
Flop gets checked through. I can still have JJ-AA, he is very very unlikely to have a real strong hand. I'd put him on JTo,QTo,Q7s type of stuff or TT. He also might check a weak flush/straightdraw behind.

Turn: ($390) K (2 players)
Hero bets $155, Button calls $155
Pot is 390 and I only bet 155. My plan is to bet about half pot on the river again, representing the thought process of me knowing he has a marginal hand and me trying to milk. I could probably win the pot by betting big on the turn and shoving river, but I thought this should work out the same and is cheaper. Why would I ever bluff so small when it's likely he can call at least one bet, right? If I were to get raised on the turn I'd fold and give him credit for KJ type of hand.

River: ($700) 4 (2 players)
Hero bets $335, Button raises $1100, Hero raises $1996 (All-In), Button calls $723 (All-In)
The river is a good card for me as it does not complete the straight for hands like TT/QTo/JTo. Considering his and my range, my riverbet basically turns all his hands into bluffcatchers. My OOP defending range largely consists of broadways. I can and would play boats in a similar way. I would probably 4bet JJ pre, but I don't mind flatting QQ+ at all against someone who is an active 3bettor. If I have QQQ or KKK I have the deck crusehd. I would bet small to either induce a raise or get a crying call, for the exact same reason I think I can bluff cheaply: I simply do not think he has a hand that wants to call a riverbet.

What happens in this hand is he raises me, and I go over the hand. Everything up to the river led me believe he had a marginal hand at best. Now he raises my small riverbet. How often does he play KQ this way? Or ATo? Or KK? How often do I have the nuts? I put everything together and come to the conclusion that he has turned a marginal hand into a bluff because he thinks (probably correctly so) that he can't profitable flat the river. In reality this seems like a bad bluff vs me. I would not blockbet this river with anything in my range. I am either snapping a raise (or shoving) or I was bluffing and I snapfold. With my read in this hand I do what I haven't done in like 4 months... I bluff 3bet the river. My read was correct but he made the ultimate call. I honestly don't think this is good vs my range, but who knows, maybe he has a timingtell. Or he's that good. Or he's a superuser.

Total pot: $4346

Results:
Button had 10, Q (two pair, Queens and fours).
Hero had 7, 6 (one pair, fours).
Outcome: Button won $4344