Hold'em:


I feel pretty good about my game. I've had quite some experience
before and now I feel that I'm sort of dominating on every table that
I sit on. 10bb/100 is sustainable for me at 10NL and everything
below.

I'm taking a more aggro approach with my bankroll.
The idea is, if I feel that I'm going to dominate in a game. Take a
shot at it.
This might involve me taking some 25NL shots pretty soon
now. Basically risk 1/2 or 1/3 of the roll. Sure there is variance and
one can get unlucky. But you won't get far either if you become a
grinding robot at your stakes. If you lose at some higher stakes,
at least you've got some experience now.
And hey, this is all from my initial 30EUR deposit (a bit less than
$40usd). Really nothing to lose here.


Omaha:


Ugh, here's where I suck. The reason I play omaha is to
diversify. Hold'em can get pretty damn boring. Thus I feel that this
game suits my character best as a way to diversify. I've spent almost
even hours playing both. The reason I've got less hands in Omaha is
because the game goes slower. More people see flops etc. And the
additional difficulty of me identifying what hand I've got and what
outs I've got
Will take me a while to fill in the gaps of mastery in omaha with some
experience.
At 5PLO I'm getting destroyed and running bad

Overall not bad for playing poker on the side. I'd be really satisfied
if I play 30k or more hands p/m however.