NFL Fantasy 2011

[Vitas23]

Originally Posted by jupiter

FWIW when I typed the word "collusion" that was to give my only reason for vetoing any trade, not this one.

I just think Matthews for Cam is uneven, I don't mind though. Don't say bomb on an airplane.

I agree, not every trade is going to be completely even, if Matt is willing to give up a small edge in order to get a quarterback since he draft Manning who is 100% out for the season seems understandable.

For people to attack my friend Jose, the nicest guy in the world, a pastor at his church, and accuse him of "pulling an extremely dickish move" is absurd!

[robbyd86]

wow, i missed a lot while at language school

[Probability]

i dont really care one way or the other, im currently 0/3 and am pretty sure i have no shot to win.

[Vitas23]

Originally Posted by Probability

i dont really care one way or the other, im currently 0/3 and am pretty sure i have no shot to win.

It's def not over.

[Probability]

and now everyone is bum hunting me for trades. awesome.

[Vitas23]

Originally Posted by Probability

and now everyone is bum hunting me for trades. awesome.

I guess the tides have turned for years you were the most notorious sports betting bum hunter.

[mythrilfox]

Originally Posted by Vitas23

I am also going to instant veto any trade they are involved in.

first off, what what what? is this a joke?

second, you're in a much more biased position than me or the other ppl who found the trade dubious since you know the guy and know that he's stand-up. i don't know the guy, i don't know that he's a pastor. all i know is matt isnt very serious about fantasy and several hours after britt suffers a season ending injury he's involved in a pretty uneven trade. you're telling me this doesn't look shady? i'll admit i got the torches and pitchforks out too early but 9 times out of 10 that's gonna be trade-rape and not just a really weird trade.

anyway, i apologized and it's water under the bridge to me so hopefully it is to everyone else as well.

[Vitas23]

Yeah, I'm not too sure why 2 injured players would be involved in a trade but they are both done so like I said before its a wash. I also don't think the trade is extremely uneven. If I had to guess maybe 60/40 but Matt was in desperate need of a QB. I also think Matt is taking it somewhat serious and not just punting off his money.

I probably over reacted but I didn't like the fact that everyone was quick to attack Jose when it was Matt who proposed the final trade.

[robbyd86]

ya, we should really all hate matt

[Probability]

why did yahoo not count my loss vs aaron last week? it says im 0/3 instead of 0/4.