Leggo Poker Every Tool You Need To Win
Go Back   LeggoPoker > Poker Training Video Discussion > Poker Training Video Analysis
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:29 PM
tedtodd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 126
Blog Entries: 37
Default Comment

Love your vids! Stars>Party
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:28 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 37
I don't think he says it's tougher, just different.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 09:26 PM
Video Producer / Poker Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cash Game Grinder?
Posts: 582
Blog Entries: 104
domir:

yeah, you are right that you are turning your hand faceup.

basically the choice is between checking behind and making your hand easier to get to showdown, or betting the flop because of balancing your range and not turning your hand faceup.

against an opponent who will stay in line i agree with what you said, and i think betting the flop is better, but against guys that don't play standard, and might either bet the turn and river as a bluff, or checkraise the flop as a bluff, i prefer to just check behind and call down.

i felt like he was out of line and aggro enough that he would be likely to pounce on weakness.

it's kind of a catch 22 thing because if he's good, he should be able to read my hand and only bet with an ace or better, but if i thought he was good, i would have just bet the flop.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 09:36 PM
Video Producer / Poker Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cash Game Grinder?
Posts: 582
Blog Entries: 104
melchiades: yeah i think you're mostly right, but it does matter a little bit because of card removal (obv you know this) and also i will actually 4-bet/call there sometimes vs the threebettor (not the original raiser obv tho) since i'm only making the 4-bet if i think villain is super aggro, and if he knows i know that then he might still shove wide enough because he knows i know he might have a wide range and my play will look super strong etc etc.

i didn't really know adsanman well enough to do anything but fold, but the reason i paused i guess is that vs really spewy guys (scandis, russians) i will 4-bet there with AQ but not A2 because i feel i have to call allin. just used to at least considering the situation i guess.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2008, 09:40 PM
Video Producer / Poker Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cash Game Grinder?
Posts: 582
Blog Entries: 104
leakyfaucet: fair enough! i probably do make party comparisons a little too much and i can see how that would be annoying for someone who wasn't able to play there.

i guess it's just that i'm known for playing on party, and im aware that a lot of people that like my videos like them because they also play on party, and that makes some of what i talk about especially relevant to them.

i will try make less comparisons, and fwiw i think a higher winrate is achievable on party than on stars or FT in general, but you also get more tough decisions on party too.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 02:50 AM
Nielsio's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 77
Blog Entries: 21
Calling the overbet with K9 is a mistake imo.

He clearly loves his hand so it's either a big draw or made hand. And because he bet so much he'll talk himself into calling a raise with both (i.e. he'll snapcall it).

Furthermore: calling the overbet is going to make it much less likely for him to keep bluffing.

I would at least double his turn-bet.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 05:13 AM
Video Producer / Poker Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cash Game Grinder?
Posts: 582
Blog Entries: 104
he had jack high for a gutshot though?

and has enough left to bluff the river

i thought he often had nothing in that spot, and, not being results oriented, but the fact that he called the flop with jack high no draw just to donk-overbet bluff me on the turn kinda demonstrates in and of itself that he is bluffy enough that calling the turn is correct, doesnt it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 05:23 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
I'm agree with Seabeast on that K9 hand. He looked like he was going to shove the river on any card. Like he had clear plan -- insta overbet turn, leaving just about pot sized river shove.

Seabest:

Yeah agree that KK hand. Then it gets interesting when you know that villain thinks that its bad Bluff spot cause you aren't folding KK, so now he should bluff it knowing that you think he should have Ax+ cause its bad spot to bluff and now you are folding KK, lol.

Last edited by domir : 06-26-2008 at 05:30 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 01:38 PM
Nielsio's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 77
Blog Entries: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEABEAST View Post
he had jack high for a gutshot though?

and has enough left to bluff the river

i thought he often had nothing in that spot, and, not being results oriented, but the fact that he called the flop with jack high no draw just to donk-overbet bluff me on the turn kinda demonstrates in and of itself that he is bluffy enough that calling the turn is correct, doesnt it?

This post is entirely results oriented. Not sure how to respond to that..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2008, 04:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 245
Blog Entries: 28
Send a message via AIM to IcarusJam
I liked it all personally, i felt like you were clear headed and really broke down ranges well. US sites don't like u tho :-p
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiSpurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes