Best (fishiest) site for NL100

[Pleex]

Hi,
I plan to start at a new site with about 2k and would like to pick one of your rakeback sites. Whats the fishiest site of the rakeback sites leggopoker offers in your oppinion? Oh and I don't really like playing on softwares like Pacific so the software should be ok too

Thanks,
Pleex

[Tickner]

I am not sure which sites are fishiest, but I would recommend FTP or Cake.

[Pleex]

Cake doesn't support huds and I think FTP competition is relatively strong, right?

Could an admin move this thread, because not many people seem to look into the rakeback forum.

[uNIS]

Stars.

[Pleex]

do you really think stars is fishy? from what I've heard and from what others say it's not.. at least not for nl100 standards.

[uNIS]

yes, but I also think it depends on ur style of play. if ur playing loose I think american sites is the way to go, if ur game is somewhat tighter I would go w/ european sites.

[Pleex]

I play about 22/18 at nl50.. no real stats for nl100 so far. is this rather loose or tight?

[The72o]

it's loose tag, seems to be good for stars

[DIB79]

How is the competition on FTP compared to euro sites? I read everywhere that full tilt is a lot tougher than other sites, but there gotta be loads of bad players too on such a big site? I`ll be playing from NL50 to NL100.

[etown]

party poker if u dont care about rakeback
all there promos they run pretty much make up for rakeback