100nl get c/r as expected, now to the turn

[Daboss]

I'm not sure about the turn play here but flop play may be debatable as well.

I had been battling back and forth with the villain and was getting the better of him when this hand came up.

I bet the flop fully expecting a c/r and called. I had 300 hands on him and had c/r the flop 25%.

Is there any merit in doing anything than calling the flop?

On the turn I pair up and shove, is call and call non H rivers more optimal or is trapping his FD+overs that are bet/calling the turn more profitable?

I also think he folds some % of the time too

IPoker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 3 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

SB: $107.75
BB: $101
Hero (BTN): $201.05

Pre-Flop: 5 7 dealt to Hero (BTN)
Hero raises to $3, SB folds, BB calls $2

Flop: ($6.50) 6 3 8 (2 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets $5, BB raises to $14, Hero calls $9

Turn: ($34.50) 5 (2 Players)
BB bets $25, Hero raises to $184.05 and is All-In,

[DRUK88]

If you are fully expecting a c/r on the flop, why haven't you planned for this?

[Daboss]

Well, my plan was to call any 4 or 9 and shove if I hit a pair but I'm not sure if this is optimal.

[mythrilfox]

doubt he bet/calls worse on the turn like ever, which makes a turn jam pretty bad. i prob call/call non heart rivers against this guy

[DRUK88]

Yeah agree with above, the turn jam is pretty bad considering he is hardly ever bet/calling worse.

Because of his high c/r % on the flop, you really should be adjusting on flops like this with the hand you have. There may be some merit to checking back on the flop maybe?

[Daboss]

Do we think villain bet folds AThh etc on the turn? Ie overs and a FD

And yep, there is an adjustment to be made vs villain but I don't think I should be checking back 7h. Maybe AJ or 2nd pair but I think betting w the oesd and no showdown value is ok here

[DRUK88]

^^ That's reasonable, but if we are betting, what is our plan vs the "likely" c/r? Because we do have no showdown value, and there is also a flushdraw out so even if we hit we are likely worried of being outdrawn or him at least having possible redraws?

I think when you bet/call on this type of board things get a bit confusing (like they are here), which is why there may still be merit to checking back vs this type of oponent specifically.

[lancelott_]

fps
bad card for him to continue bluffing or semibluffing, yet he still bets it. When he ch-raises this flop he reps polorized range and there is no need to rebluff a polorized range since he folds out air and never folds his value ch-raising hands
fold flop btw

[mythrilfox]

"fold flop btw"

wtffffff

[ssells73]

I wouldn't put too much stock into 300 hands and 25% c/r, that could be like 2/8 times he's c/r or something, so wouldn't worry too much about that.

It's a decent flop to check back though b/c these are boards where people attack and you obviously don't wanna 3bai. Also, by checking back when you hit your straight your hand is so underrepped/sneaky.

As played I don't like shoving turn, I'd probably call and play some poker on the river.