Irishman07 - Defending 3-Bets

[Irishman07]

Dan continues his theory discussion on defending 3-bets. He highlights the process by reviewing hands to determine what to do with one's entire range.

[Irishman07]

Just a quick error correction - around 26 mins in I mistake the amount villain needs to risk on a shove - he risks his whole stack so he would need us to fold more than what I said in the video.

[QuipIt]

You base a ton of the analysis on the assumption that his 3bet stat is accurate... and you have a 100 hand sample on what seems to be a very tight player. I would assume his 3bet stat hasn't converged and is probably above the true %.

[Irishman07]

All we can go on is the info we have - it is possible that he doesn't 3bet that much, but based on statistics I think the observed frequency is the most likely frequency. I also don't think I went overboard on the assumption - I was still fairly conservative in my defending range, so even if he is a bit tighter in his 3bet range we still should be doing ok vs it.

[QuipIt]

Fair enough, by the way I do enjoy this format a lot.. maybe try and spend less time zoning in on every possible detail in order to have more time to examine other hands though.

[Koerperkarle]

maybe try and spend less time zoning in on every possible detail

Isnt this what these videos are for?

[QuipIt]

I just think the analysis for this hand could've easily been done in half the time without skipping any important details.

[MrBoefie]

Originally Posted by QuipIt

I just think the analysis for this hand could've easily been done in half the time without skipping any important details.

No offense to Dan, but I agree with Quiplt.The format is nice, but it gets boring after a while imo.