sauce123 - $50 NL Part 1

[czglory]

Originally Posted by Anthony18

OMG OMG OMG!

This made my day, watching it right now.

was literally going to post OMG OMG OMG!

+1

[harangutang]

Looking forward to hot sauce committee part 2.

[yegor]

great vid!

@~25:00 you ask about your explanation of the 44 hand(4c4d o JT2dd). you say check-calling flop is fine and check-calling turn again may also be fine if he barrels a lot of hands like K9o, no clubs. isn't check-raisning better if you assume he bet-folds a lot? or donking as a semi-bluff if you expect he's very straightforward? honestly i can't see myself check-calling here..so basically wha range do you put him on when you check-call and what's your plan? definitly you're not expecting winning at showdown after turn goes check-check,right?

[palqkat]

Please SAUCE make a MSNL video, your high stakes thinking would be much more applicable there and range estimations would be closer as well.

As for the vid:

Would it not bet better to raise the 1032hh cbet in 3bet pot with 76cc with bd FD and BD str than floating considering how much combos of Ak and AQ there are and that players at these stakes would be much less likely to shove overs facing a flop raise?

[lancelott_]

Sauce is the man
+1 for MSNL 6max series from sauce

[shootaa]

Great video man. I like to pretend you're Jessie Eisenburg while I'm watching. Thought I'd come clean.

[lancelott_]

i mean honestly i dont even care about stakes anymore (just watched whole vid, just amazing)
you can make nl25 series fwiw, i`d still watch it all like crazy

[RunAndGun28]

Just wanted to say I definitely appreciate and would listen to Sauce talk about any level of poker, but getting a 50nl video from a guy Jungleman recently claimed he thought was top 3 NLHE HU in the world is sort of a slap in the face to those of us who pay for a subscription to see guys like Nutsinho, Chewy, AEJones, and Sauce123 in their element.

It's already been stated there are plenty of people who are very capable of teaching these stakes and I think that it's potentially arguable that those people are actually better suited to be teaching these stakes as they have more experience with the types of opponent's and types of play to be expected.

[gabork_jai]

I totally agree with everything RunAndGun28 mentioned - exactly the same thoughts I had,

[dcole]

You said that the best hands to 3bet with are those which we cannot profitably flat call with in a given spot, and those that have high implied odds. Does this ever include small pp's?

19:30, table 1 - You 3bet J9s from the blinds, then c/c flop and turn and c/f river on T9226, and acknowledged that the turn should be a fold due to lack of knowledge on villains frequencies and ranges. Could you explain why you chose to take a c/c line in the first place as the preflop 3bettor instead of taking a line that would make the hand easier to play against an unknown? Does taking a passive line turn our hand too face-up and thereby put us in tough/-EV spots if villain is even remotely balanced?

22:30, table 2 - You said to always bet the KQ on QT8 double suited, which I of course agree with. What do you prefer on different turns when called? Are you usually going for only 2 streets of value against a reg in this spot, and if so, which 2 streets? I'm assuming flop and turn since the board is drawy? Also, what do you do when the turn card is scary and helps villains range? Do you like a turn check back and fold river? These questions are in the context of being against a relatively unknown villain who we have no real info on.