|

02-04-2012, 02:24 PM
|
 |
Don
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 809
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
This is top drawer quality, best 6max vid of the year. 10/10 like a boss.
The first hand blew my mind a little bit, to be honest.
|

02-04-2012, 02:41 PM
|
|
Don
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 848
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
This is good stuff. Glad to see u around again man.
|

02-06-2012, 12:18 AM
|
|
Capo
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 485
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
i literally was not, or could be not listening to whatever Denny was talking about poker in the end of the vid, was just staring at that desktop. impossible to concentrate
thx for vid anyways, love ur stuff, keep em comming
|

02-06-2012, 12:33 PM
|
|
Associate
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 48
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
Denny, the 99 hand where you end up bluffing the river on the 4 str8 kxxx board was very interesting to me. Your read is that Kx should fold enough to make that the best play surprised me. I would have expected given your image that getting villain off of Kx would be optimistic. Are u also bluffing for the rare times your 99 is good but checking induces bluffs from all worse hands that got to the river? Just a spot where I would have never bet 3x and I am curious if you felt it was clear that it was the best play or was it so close that it is not a spot I should be concerned that I would have played differently?
|

02-07-2012, 01:13 AM
|
|
Associate
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 15
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
Can you link to the AEjones article you talk about on turn checkraising, I can not seem to find it. Thanks!
|

02-07-2012, 03:49 AM
|
|
making fun of the homeless
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 145
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by habanero
Can you link to the AEjones article you talk about on turn checkraising, I can not seem to find it. Thanks!
|
http://www.leggopoker.com/forums/pri...ange-6625.html
|

02-07-2012, 07:05 PM
|
|
LeggoPoker Coach / Video Producer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 608
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by dangerfish
Denny, the 99 hand where you end up bluffing the river on the 4 str8 kxxx board was very interesting to me. Your read is that Kx should fold enough to make that the best play surprised me. I would have expected given your image that getting villain off of Kx would be optimistic. Are u also bluffing for the rare times your 99 is good but checking induces bluffs from all worse hands that got to the river? Just a spot where I would have never bet 3x and I am curious if you felt it was clear that it was the best play or was it so close that it is not a spot I should be concerned that I would have played differently?
|
I don't think it matters too much if you choose a different line in this hand. I do think that it'd be a very tough call with Kx there, and it also helps if he had a worse hand than mine, because checking would almost certainly lose me the hand.
|

02-13-2012, 09:31 PM
|
 |
Don
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 586
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
Hey, very nice vid
Here are 2 questions:
Min. 16.30 (Explanation why not X/Ring turns):
I also do rarely X/R turn vs. 2ndBar. Against REGs to protect my X/Call-range there and for balance….
But I do not agree that there are better semibluffinglines vs. 2ndbarells by starting with a check…
X/C – lead River is pointless and destroys all the balance-point and what else can you do OOP?
Min. 18 – T9s:
Ah, not sure if you can rely here 100% that Villains would fold here their bluffcatchers always to an overstab -> hence your logic behind overstabing here to make it cheaper and remove the need of betting twice might be wrong here in a decent %-tage.
|

02-15-2012, 11:11 AM
|
|
LeggoPoker Coach / Video Producer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 608
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prologion
Hey, very nice vid
Here are 2 questions:
Min. 16.30 (Explanation why not X/Ring turns):
I also do rarely X/R turn vs. 2ndBar. Against REGs to protect my X/Call-range there and for balance….
But I do not agree that there are better semibluffinglines vs. 2ndbarells by starting with a check…
X/C – lead River is pointless and destroys all the balance-point and what else can you do OOP?
|
Hey,
I meant that in the spot you mentioned, a better line would be imo to either do something else on the flop (lead or c/r) or just c/f the turn. I try to play my draws according to what I predict is going to happen on the turn. So, contrary to what a lot of players think, I rather c/c a NFD on the flop than a 9 high FD, just in case he bets the turn again, with the NFD I can call again, usually.
Quote:
Min. 18 – T9s:
Ah, not sure if you can rely here 100% that Villains would fold here their bluffcatchers always to an overstab -> hence your logic behind overstabing here to make it cheaper and remove the need of betting twice might be wrong here in a decent %-tage.
|
Yea, sometimes I misconstruct people's turn calling range and give up on the river when I actually should bet. This could be one of those cases. Still doesn't make a turn overbet bad though, just because he'll fold a lot anyways.
|

02-15-2012, 05:11 PM
|
 |
Don
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 586
|
|
Re: The_End - $1,000 NL Part 1
hey, thx for answering - very helpful post regards exspecially to my 1st question 
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|