In this video Greg plays 2 tables of $100 NL heads up with live commentary against Leggo member "meeloche", a very skilled mid-stakes 6-Max grinder. Greg explains his approach for the match, the adjustments he makes and how he would play "meeloche" in future matches.
Is it possible that you overanalyze meeloche? I agree that he's a good player but you seem to give him a lot of credit to adapt. I mean obviously he does adapt, but does his perception of you 'twist'?.
I don't know if it's a good assumption that mid stakes regs have 'dynamic reads'. I think the large majority of players just think "Ok this guy barrels a lot, donks a balanced range, 3bets a lot and opens 90%" added with some specific reads "turn raise with medium hands on wet boards, check down river."
Examples where I think you're giving your opponent too much credit:
[LIST]
[*] Around 35 mins villain changing his delayed-cbet range.
[*]Other spot, 11:35 where you donk turn. I agree that he'll expect you to barrel 2 streets, but I doubt that's because you've shown aggression before. It's a good type of board for you to continue on many rivers.
[/LIST]
Yea I understand what you're saying, and I guess I should have hinted at it more in the video, but Meeloche knows a lot more about my game than an average "mid stakes regular."
