luckychewy - $5,000 NL

Brought to you by LeggoPoker coach luckychewy

(9.83)
WMV STREAM (FLASH)
To Download: Right Click -> Save As
In this video Andrew plays 2 tables of $5,000 NL on PokerStars and 2 tables of $1,000 NL on Full Tilt. Andrew discusses finding good spots to 3-bet, checking to induce in 3-bet pots and explains his thoughts while breaking down ranges. Chewy claims this is the best video on Leggo. . . ?
Video Discussion (View Forum Thread)
Member Post Action
bromancing In that spot where you have KTcc and you hit your T on the turn you said you would probably fold the river unimproved. Isn't two pair close to the top of your range if the flush misses the river? Or would you slow play A7 and a set of 7's ip on this board? Couldn't he value bet AQ on the river?

To be more clear it was the AK7cc.. Tx.. Ax
steel108 The player that you said you didn't know, but was from the Netherlands is a Leggo Pro; The_End. I always get a kick out of that.
aejones LOL, after the video I was like "how did The_End play?" and Chewy is like, what's his SN? and then I had to explain to him how The_End = The_Eend or w/e his sn is...
lancelott_ ok so who`s gonna make the vid of the month for leggo? so many nominations, huh..
cntgetmedown Around 32:20 on table 4 vs the half stack "Wolfy13" you chk back ATs on QQAdd, because you say he's not peeling wide. I think I disagree. Imo the stereotype 50bb stacker can have any broadway (frequently peeling with gutshots), any suited ace and a fair amount of flush draws, relative to his position. Unless you know this player and therefore have a more specific read on him I think it's best just to get two streets on flop and turn and then reevaluate the river. My main concern that might lead me to a chk back would be if I thought I'd handle a checkraise poorly and it would happen with a significant frequency and/or I thought he'd barrel bluff turn and river too much, but this doesn't seem to be the kind of board texture I would worry too much about that on. I'm not saying I don't mind your line, I just thought I would add my thoughts, because you said a check back was standard.
zed. whenyou have 75hh on AdXdXd, what are you doing on a 2spade river, what about a 2diamond river?

edit: cash money
luckychewy
In that spot where you have KTcc and you hit your T on the turn you said you would probably fold the river unimproved. Isn't two pair close to the top of your range if the flush misses the river? Or would you slow play A7 and a set of 7's ip on this board? Couldn't he value bet AQ on the river?

To be more clear it was the AK7cc.. Tx.. Ax


i don't think he'd bet aq on the river, especially for a big bet because so many stronger hands are in my range such as hands like 77, a7, at, qj etc. it's a very bold spot for him to bluff and i couldn't see it happening all that often, but for the rare times it does occur i'm folding the ~bottom of my range so it's fine.
luckychewy
Around 32:20 on table 4 vs the half stack "Wolfy13" you chk back ATs on QQAdd, because you say he's not peeling wide. I think I disagree. Imo the stereotype 50bb stacker can have any broadway (frequently peeling with gutshots), any suited ace and a fair amount of flush draws, relative to his position. Unless you know this player and therefore have a more specific read on him I think it's best just to get two streets on flop and turn and then reevaluate the river. My main concern that might lead me to a chk back would be if I thought I'd handle a checkraise poorly and it would happen with a significant frequency and/or I thought he'd barrel bluff turn and river too much, but this doesn't seem to be the kind of board texture I would worry too much about that on. I'm not saying I don't mind your line, I just thought I would add my thoughts, because you said a check back was standard.


those hands will likely put money in the pot on a future street, in addition to some bluffs and total airballs(9to 78s etc) that turn 1 pair.
luckychewy
whenyou have 75hh on AdXdXd, what are you doing on a 2spade river, what about a 2diamond river?

edit: cash money


was going to shove in all likelihood but that's a spot that is entirely game time decision oriented ;X
luckychewy
LOL, after the video I was like "how did The_End play?" and Chewy is like, what's his SN? and then I had to explain to him how The_End = The_Eend or w/e his sn is...


janters gonn' jante...
digeri In regards to bluffing a diamond river, do you not think a diamond river significantly improves villain's range (pair+diamond) and weakens your range (since you're now not value betting anything worse than Q or J of diamonds) to such a degree that betting it as a bluff should be done as an exception rather than as a rule? Villain would need to peel turn quite often with Ax without a diamond for this shove to be profitable no?
drawingdeadd7 Thats what she said!!! LOL!
luckychewy
In regards to bluffing a diamond river, do you not think a diamond river significantly improves villain's range (pair+diamond) and weakens your range (since you're now not value betting anything worse than Q or J of diamonds) to such a degree that betting it as a bluff should be done as an exception rather than as a rule? Villain would need to peel turn quite often with Ax without a diamond for this shove to be profitable no?


to a good hand reader, yes. some guys won't realize this. the future looks good for you.
Doublefly
LOL, after the video I was like "how did The_End play?" and Chewy is like, what's his SN? and then I had to explain to him how The_End = The_Eend or w/e his sn is...


This was so funny. They've only been working together for over a year, and I think I just saw a The_End video where he mentions Chewy.
Back to Videos